To the editor BakuToday It was an open letter to Gennady Zûganovu, Vladimir Marchenko, which is reproduced below:

“Gennady Andreyevich! If you have any decency and political correctness, because you know the actual address of the PSPU and Natalia Vitrenko, know the essence of Ukrainian Communists, you have to apologize to the PROGRESSIVE SOCIALISTS and Natalia Vitrenko for hosted on the website of the COMMUNIST PARTY which his replica of a dirty and an associate of the K.k. Tajsaeva ‘ on the body.

The thing that is open to a number of issues I decided to independently. Natalia Vitrenko, and neither nor the PROGRESSIVE SOCIALISTS nor the Kremlin nor the Brussels nor Washington here nothing to do with it. I have enough political experience, the experience of parliamentary activities and knowledge for self treatment or self-forming to clarify the position of left-wing party KPRF in developments in Russia.

I was hoping that you personally answer them and clarify the position of the COMMUNIST PARTY of podžigaemoj revolution in Russia. I am convinced that my sincere questions you give not less than sincere and reasoned responses that will be of interest not only to me but also many supporters of socialism in the world. In response, sorry, I heard the verbal diarrhea and insults of a ârlykovyj Deputy Tajsaeva. For us no one and his name is Tajsaev. We in Ukraine such good investments. And the Deputy of the State Duma from COMMUNIST-that doesn’t mean (not mean!) that he was a Communist, but his shoulder straps help to his intellect. But his cue titled “the so called progressive Socialists of Ukraine confirmed its reputation as provocateurs and demagogues” posted on the website of the COMMUNIST PARTY. Here is a problem.

First about political correctness and there samodurstve. Gennady Andreyevich, neither I nor Natalia Mikhailovna, no member of the PSPU never allowed themselves to such boorishness: refer to the COMMUNIST PARTY “of the so-called COMMUNIST” and, moreover, refer to your political position and fight as “demagogy and provokatorstvo”. And if any of the members of the PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST PARTY itself is allowed, he would have been immediately odernut fellow of the party and the leadership of the PROGRESSIVE SOCIALISTS. But the COMMUNIST PARTY rather than responses to the open questions myself questions unleashes propaganda dogs to pokusat′ our party and our leader Natalia Vitrenko, Mihajlovnu. By the way, doctor of economic sciences, academician of several academies, professors, people’s Deputy of two convocations, candidate for President of Ukraine, 1999 and 2004, a determined fighter for socialism, in the Federal State of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus, the Russian language, ârčajšego Ukraine, intransigent anti-fascist fighter against drawing Ukraine into NATO. By the way, not only reads Marx Vitrenko (unlike many media issuance of Communist parties), it’s still understood. Among Communist and Socialist movement is really quite rare.

Tajsaev through the website of the COMMUNIST PARTY of rasplevalsâ poison zabrûzžal saliva and the leader of the left-wing party-scientist-Economist, that left-wing parties all over the world are quite rare. However, UKRAINE was pleased to host the k. Tajsaeva in Kiev, will tell the truth about our 16-year-old as parliamentary and extra-parliamentary struggle, and we are absolutely sure that such Duri from his mouth never will. I stress, an official invitation from Tajsaeva to Kiev agreed with Natalia Vitrenko, the President of UKRAINE.

Oh, and now about the main thing. On matters that are not sprâčeš′sâ that directly relate to the left movement in Russia and Ukraine and to current developments in Russia.

Whether and are the leaders of left-wing political parties, and political parties openly share assessments of developments in the world, within each country, coordinate and harmonize their actions?

Our response is not only the right but also the duty to (if you have nothing to hide). If they stand on a common platform of Marxist ideology, to assess the political and social processes in the world they are owing to the nature of the ideology. Develop the tactics of the party must not only owing to the nature of the ideology and practice of its application. The Communists must assess, identify and recognize errors, it may not be an illiterate haughty fool making with partbiletom in the Pocket to be a Communist.

In discussion (honest discussions!), give the exact facts first, and then evaluate them. We are in favour of such a discussion, including on the activities of the PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST PARTY. But what are the facts, and then make the conclusions. If there are no facts, and labels are sewn prišivaûtsâ speculation is demagogy. Therefore not PROGRESSIVE SOCIALISTS and Vitrenko demagogues, and Mr Tajsaev, as the facts he doesn’t call. Here it is the purest water demagogue.

As the Deputy of the PSPU casually equated to “fair Russia” and all the hatred of his Russian opponents postponed to 2009 and Vitrenko. This manipulation, vile and dirty. No parallels the PROGRESSIVE SOCIALISTS and “fair Russia” nor ideology nor the practice of political struggle. We are not yet at the American Embassy, and piketiruem it, we are not involved and do not participate in the colour revolutions, and to fight with them, wherever they are not United States State Department organized-in Yugoslavia, Georgia, Libya, Iran, Ukraine or Russia. But Mr Tajsaevu is apparently not known. Then the comparison pustoporožnoe. And if you know our position, and yet he went on this comparison, it is certainly a cheap political zakazuha, provocation, common professional provoker.

Anyway, the story’s hogging all the “I”.

But current events in Russia and Ukraine and the role of the left parties, of course, require urgent analysis. The Bible teaches not between words, and for judging.

Gennady Andreyevich! From the replica of your companion-neither I nor anyone else has received an answer to the question, do you think that rallies in Russia is only the struggle for fair elections? Or the problem is broader: using the wrestlers for fair elections, raised in Russia, a color revolution to overthrow the Putin and later takeover by pro-Western Liberals?

Not I, Gennady Andreyevich, invented technology of non-violent revolutions, and Gene Sharp. And enjoy in all countries where are color revolutions. And orange putschists in Ukraine by train. We talk openly about it. Public recognition of one of the leaders of the Orange, t. Steckiva, they have one year before the 2004 presidential election, planned the revolution ordered tents, scarves, ribbons. Funded by the coup United States State Department, known you Boris Berezovsky and other authorities and oligarchs, whose main task was to prevent Yushchenko with Ukrainian integration with Russia and Belarus, to drag Ukraine into NATO and to dismantle our people as part of old Russian, Eastern Slavic civilization.

Natalia Vitrenko PARTY of UKRAINE and were in mortal combat with orange leaders of the coup. Then Yanukovych defended as an alternative to Yushchenko. This is our party members not only beat, but also killed podpalivali their homes, crushed our party Office on Khreshchatyk. This is Natalia Vitrenko in December 2004 3rd led 35-thousandth convoy of miners, was swept away the Orange Maidan. This is Natalia Vitrenko at Khreshchatyk surrounded the orange with the intention of schizophrenics kill and maim. Rescued miners.

May Tajsaeva for Sir this demagogy and provocation. For us it is a sincere and honest struggle that was there, in Russia, such as Tajsaev, sitting in warm rooms and observing the Ukrainian revolution on TV.

Therefore, unlike many Russians, including members of the COMMUNIST PARTY, we know the price and color revolutions, and their consequences. I personally and the PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST PARTY strongly opposes the orange revolution in Russia. For Tajsaeva it’s “demagogy and provocation”. So give the same answer: you for the color revolution in Russia or against? And will you be 26 February in the chain with the White Army to surround the Kremlin?

Not I invented, and you have declared their intention to take part in a rally at the Swamp area. Among the political variety of 4 February there were flags of the COMMUNIST PARTY. Why do you not speak? Maybe my questions have stopped active participation of the COMMUNIST PARTY in the action at the swamp area? And, despite the dirty attack Tajsaeva the PACE and Natalia Vitrenko, I am glad that you pritormozilis′ and think.

As the cowardly Deputy Tajsaev in his odious response out of their companions-the “revolutionaries” of the COMMUNIST PARTY in the preparation of Orange putsch in Ukraine. Gennady Andreyevich, you tell us about the block, then the opposition of the Ukrainian authorities, who were led by Yushchenko, Tymoshenko, Symonenko and Moroz. Tell us about their joint promotions: “Arise, Ukraine!”, and then “Ukraine without Kuchma”. All this razogrevalo people to Orange Maidan. Gennady Andreyevich, since you yourself publicly in 2004, called candidate of Ukraine Petr Simonenko’s support in the second round of Viktor Yanukovych. Symonenko had not supported. Then logically Tajsaeva a demagogue and a provoker and Zyuganov were the COMMUNIST PARTY. We were in favour of Yanukovich, in the hope that he will lead Ukraine in a Customs Union and the Union State of Russia and Belarus. It’s becoming President, he showed himself mazepincem, NATOvcem and westernizer. Us, voters, like Russia, it is dumped. But at the moment we have struggled with the orange of the coup. And Ukrainian Communists they helped! Alms and not encouraged their constituents back in 2004 year, support of Yanukovich.

For me the question: If the Communist parties had not returned to the format of sectarian relations are based on a common ideology are required to produce a common position. From the message Tajsaeva I never got a response indeed. This is a typical demagogic unsubscription. So the CPRF or COMMUNIST PARTY condemns today justifies and Symonenko participated in the orange revolution in Ukraine in 2004 year?

I want to understand the overall logic of the Communists in the postslavânskom space. Transnistrian President Igor Nikolaevich baiting Smirnova, pro-Western course of your companion Voronin in Chisinau, participation of Ukrainian Communist putsch in Orange, 2004 unanimously voting for the law on the fundamentals of domestic and foreign policy “that approved the rate of Ukraine’s European integration, their voting for a multi-billion-dollar debt write-off of the oligarchs, and so on, and so on what Marxism, to defend the interests of workers and socialism?

And in conclusion. Gennadi Andreevich. Not only do you know your participation in establishing the results of the elections to the State Duma December 4, 2011 year. Explain this to your borzopiscam.

To be correct, just if you apologize to the PROGRESSIVE SOCIALISTS and Natalia Vitrenko, the černuhu issued in light of Tajsaevym. After all, presidential elections will be held, and our party will remain. And the leaders have to meet and look each other in the eye. Or, maybe, God willing, and collaborate. So properly apologize right now.

Vladimir Marchenko-the people’s Deputy of Ukraine I, II and III of the convocations, Vice-Chairman of the PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST PARTY on ideology